Multi-Faceted Constructs in Abnormal Psychology: Implications of the Bifactor S – 1 Model for Individual Clinical Assessment.

Related Articles

Multi-Faceted Constructs in Abnormal Psychology: Implications of the Bifactor S – 1 Model for Individual Clinical Assessment.

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;:

Authors: Eid M

Abstract
Burns et al. (this issue) have shown that the application of the symmetrical bifactor model to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms leads to anomalous and inconsistent results across different rater groups. In contrast to the symmetrical bifactor model, applications of the bifactor S-1 model showed consistent and theoretically well-founded results. The implications of the bifactor S-1 model for individual clinical assessment are discussed. It is shown that individual factor scores of the bifactor S-1 model reveal important information about the profile of individual symptoms that is not captured by factor scores of the multidimensional model with correlated first-order factors. It is argued that for individual clinical assessment factor scores from both types of model (multidimensional model with correlated first-order factors, bifactor S -1 model) should be estimated and compared. Finally, a general strategy for choosing an appropriate model for analyzing multi-faceted constructs is presented that compares areas of applications for (1) the multidimensional model with correlated first-order factors, (2) the bifactor S-1 model with a general reference factor, and (3) the bifactor S – 1 model with a directly assessed general factor.

PMID: 32086729 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

via https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32086729?dopt=Abstract